Thread Report
Is H&M sustainable? We checked 790 products.
Mixed — H&M sits mid-pack at #33 of 55 brands, averaging 53.8% natural fibre. Fabric-wise, it depends heavily on what you pick.
Where H&M's catalog falls
- 31.6%
Synthetic
<30% natural fibre · 250 products
- 31.9%
Blend
30–85% natural fibre · 252 products
- 36.5%
Natural
85–100% natural fibre · 288 products
The fabric verdict
H&M isn't great, but it's not the worst either. You can find natural fibre products here if you know where to look. Stick to the categories we flagged as safe zones, and check individual items with Fibr before buying.
One honest caveat: this report measures fabric composition only. Natural fibres biodegrade and shed fewer microplastics than synthetics, which makes fibre content a meaningful — and rare — measurable sustainability signal. But it says nothing about H&M's labor practices, emissions, water use, or production volumes. Treat it as one input, not a verdict.
Best and worst categories at H&M
| Category | % natural fibre | Products |
|---|---|---|
| Jeans | 95.2% | 61 |
| T-Shirt | 87% | 96 |
| Shorts | 74.8% | 66 |
| Shirt | 68.7% | 41 |
| Skirt | 62.5% | 33 |
| Dress | 46.6% | 139 |
| Pants | 35.6% | 90 |
Monthly Thread Reports
Get reports like this in your inbox.
We analyze thousands of products every month. Be the first to see new Thread Reports — fabric data nobody else publishes.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is H&M sustainable?
On fabric composition — the one factor we can measure — H&M averages 53.8% natural fibre across 790 products, ranking #33 of 55 brands we track. That's roughly mid-pack. Fabric data can't speak to labor practices, emissions, or water use, so treat this as one input, not a verdict.
Is H&M fast fashion?
We measure fabric, not business models — so we can't classify H&M as fast fashion or not. What the data shows: 27% of their products are polyester-heavy and 33.4% are nearly all-natural (95%+ natural fibre). Heavy synthetic reliance often correlates with fast-fashion production, but it isn't proof either way.
Is H&M good quality?
Fabric composition is a reasonable quality proxy: natural fibres generally breathe better, last longer, and shed fewer microplastics. H&M averages 53.8% natural fibre, which is about average. Individual items vary widely, so check the composition label on each piece.
Is H&M worth it? Should I buy from them?
That depends on what you're buying. 33.4% of H&M's catalog is nearly all-natural, so good pieces exist even beyond their solid average. Use the Fibr extension to check fabric composition on individual items while you shop — it varies more within a brand than between brands.
Is H&M mostly synthetic or natural?
47% of H&M products are majority synthetic (less than 50% natural fibre by weighted content). The catalog as a whole averages 53.8% natural fibre, so it leans mixed.
Related reports.
Explore the Thread Report
Part of an openly-licensed dataset.
This page is one view of Fibr's Thread Report — fabric composition data for major fashion retailers, free to read and cite. Explore the rest:
Stop buying plastic by accident.
Fibr shows you what every garment is actually made of before you buy it. Green means natural fibre. Red means plastic.
Add to Chrome — It's freeFree forever. No account, no data collected, nothing to lose.