Thread Report — Comparison
Acne Studios vs H&M: Fabric Composition Compared.
We pulled fabric composition data from 419 Acne Studios products and 936 H&M products. Acne Studios comes out clearly ahead at 78.4% average natural fibre vs H&M's 53.4% — a 25-point gap.
TL;DR
Acne Studios wins on both natural fibre content (78.4% vs 53.4%) and on having fewer polyester-heavy products (9.1% vs 27%). The headline gap is 25 percentage points of natural fibre per garment.
By the Numbers
| Metric | Acne Studios | H&M | Better |
|---|---|---|---|
| Products in sample | 419 | 936 | H&M (larger sample) |
| Avg natural fibre % | 78.4% | 53.4% | Acne Studios (over H&M) |
| % items ≥95% natural | 58.9% | 33% | Acne Studios (over H&M) |
| % items polyester-majority | 9.1% | 27% | Acne Studios (over H&M) |
Average natural fibre % per garment
% of catalogue that's polyester-majority
% of catalogue that's nearly all-natural (≥95%)
Top Fibres, Side by Side
How often each fibre appears across each brand's catalogue. A higher number means more products in the sample list that fibre on the label.
| Fibre | Acne Studios (% of products) | H&M (% of products) | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cotton | 0% | 0% | +0 |
| Polyester | 0% | 0% | +0 |
| Wool | 0% | 0% | +0 |
| Elastane | 0% | 0% | +0 |
| Viscose | 0% | 0% | +0 |
| Spandex | 0% | 0% | +0 |
| Rayon | 0% | 0% | +0 |
| Polyamide | 0% | 0% | +0 |
By Category
Average natural fibre % per garment, by category. Counts in parentheses show the number of products from each brand in the sample.
| Category | Acne Studios (count) | H&M (count) | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pants | 91.2% (40) | 34.1% (102) | +57.1 |
| Jacket | 75.3% (44) | 43.7% (5) | +31.6 |
| Dress | 63.9% (29) | 43.7% (164) | +20.2 |
| Shirt | 89.1% (33) | 69.1% (57) | +20 |
| Skirt | 55.3% (19) | 64.1% (38) | -8.8 |
| Shorts | 81.7% (19) | 76.2% (72) | +5.5 |
| T-Shirt | 87.3% (44) | 84.7% (117) | +2.6 |
| Jeans | 95% (75) | 95.7% (72) | -0.7 |
Where they're similar
Both brands lean on the same core fibres. cotton, polyester appear in the top five for both Acne Studios and H&M.
Where they differ
Acne Studios runs 25 percentage points higher on average natural fibre than H&M (78.4% vs 53.4%). H&M is markedly more polyester-heavy: 27% of items are 50%+ polyester, vs 9.1% at Acne Studios. If you specifically want nearly-all-natural garments, Acne Studios has 58.9% of its catalogue at that level — H&M sits at 33%. The biggest category divergence is pantss — Acne Studios at 91.2% natural fibre, H&M at 34.1%.
Verdict
Acne Studios is the clearer pick on fabric composition — 25.0 percentage points more natural fibre on average than H&M, with 58.9% of items at the nearly-all-natural mark vs 33%. That said, neither brand is "natural-only" — even at Acne Studios, the majority of items contain some synthetic fibre. Always check the label.
Monthly Thread Reports
Get reports like this in your inbox.
We analyze thousands of products every month. Be the first to see new Thread Reports — fabric data nobody else publishes.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Acne Studios or H&M better quality fabric?
Based on average natural fibre content, Acne Studios edges ahead — 78.4% vs 53.4% per garment across the 1,355 products we analysed. Higher natural fibre content generally correlates with better breathability, fewer microplastics, and longer wear.
Does H&M use more polyester than Acne Studios?
Yes. 27% of H&M products are polyester-heavy (50%+ polyester), compared to 9.1% at Acne Studios.
How many products did you analyse for Acne Studios vs H&M?
419 Acne Studios products and 936 H&M products — every item with a parseable fabric composition label from each brand's site.
Which has more 100% natural pieces — Acne Studios or H&M?
Acne Studios. 58.9% of Acne Studios products are nearly all-natural (95%+ natural fibre by composition) versus 33% at H&M.
What's the most common fibre at Acne Studios and H&M?
Cotton is the most common fibre at Acne Studios (in 60.1% of products), while Cotton leads at H&M (47.2% of products).
Are Acne Studios pantss better than H&M's?
For pantss specifically, Acne Studios averages 91.2% natural fibre vs H&M's 34.1%. That's a meaningful gap — if you're shopping that category, Acne Studios is the safer default.
Related reports.
Explore the Thread Report
Part of an openly-licensed dataset.
This page is one view of Fibr's Thread Report — fabric composition data for major fashion retailers, free to read and cite. Explore the rest:
Stop buying plastic by accident.
Fibr shows you what every garment is actually made of before you buy it. Green means natural fibre. Red means plastic.
Add to Chrome — It's freeFree forever. No account, no data collected, nothing to lose.