Thread Report

Abercrombie & Fitch vs H&M: Fabric Quality.

We compared 50 Abercrombie & Fitch products against 41 H&M products. Abercrombie & Fitch comes out significantly ahead at 73.7% average natural fibre vs H&M's 55.3%.

73.7%Abercrombie & Fitch
55.3%H&M
91Total Products

Head-to-Head

Average Natural Fibre %

Abercrombie & Fitch
73.7%
H&M
55.3%

Polyester-Heavy Products %

Abercrombie & Fitch
6%
H&M
29.3%

Nearly All-Natural Products %

Abercrombie & Fitch
48%
H&M
41.5%

Monthly Thread Reports

Get reports like this in your inbox.

We analyze thousands of products every month. Be the first to see new Thread Reports — fabric data nobody else publishes.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Abercrombie & Fitch or H&M better quality?

In terms of fabric composition, Abercrombie & Fitch averages 73.7% natural fibre compared to H&M's 55.3%. Higher natural fibre content generally means better quality, breathability, and fewer microplastics.

Abercrombie & Fitch vs H&M: which uses more polyester?

H&M uses more polyester — 29.3% of their products are polyester-heavy, vs 6% at Abercrombie & Fitch.

Should I shop at Abercrombie & Fitch or H&M?

If fabric quality matters to you, Abercrombie & Fitch has the edge with 73.7% average natural fibre. But quality varies by product — use the Fibr extension to check individual items while you shop at either retailer.

Related reports.

Stop buying plastic by accident.

Fibr shows you what every garment is actually made of before you buy it. Green means natural fibre. Red means plastic.

Add to Chrome — It's free

Free forever. No account, no data collected, nothing to lose.