Thread Report

Is Pull&Bear sustainable? We checked 2,182 products.

Mixed — Pull&Bear sits mid-pack at #27 of 55 brands, averaging 59.4% natural fibre. Fabric-wise, it depends heavily on what you pick.

59.4%Avg Natural Fibre
22.9%Polyester-Heavy
39.1%Majority Synthetic
#27 of 55Natural Fibre Rank

Where Pull&Bear's catalog falls

2,182Products
  • Synthetic

    <30% natural fibre · 698 products

    32%
  • Blend

    30–85% natural fibre · 489 products

    22.4%
  • Natural

    85–100% natural fibre · 995 products

    45.6%

The fabric verdict

Pull&Bear isn't great, but it's not the worst either. You can find natural fibre products here if you know where to look. Stick to the categories we flagged as safe zones, and check individual items with Fibr before buying.

One honest caveat: this report measures fabric composition only. Natural fibres biodegrade and shed fewer microplastics than synthetics, which makes fibre content a meaningful — and rare — measurable sustainability signal. But it says nothing about Pull&Bear's labor practices, emissions, water use, or production volumes. Treat it as one input, not a verdict.

Best and worst categories at Pull&Bear

Category% natural fibreProducts
Jeans98.4%292
T-Shirt88.5%388
Shorts84.1%166
Shirt80.2%98
Hoodie72.1%49
Pants51.1%208
Dress45.6%167
Skirt43%79
Jacket37.1%72
Coat36.2%22
Sweater27.4%71
Blazer13.1%17

Monthly Thread Reports

Get reports like this in your inbox.

We analyze thousands of products every month. Be the first to see new Thread Reports — fabric data nobody else publishes.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Pull&Bear sustainable?

On fabric composition — the one factor we can measure — Pull&Bear averages 59.4% natural fibre across 2,182 products, ranking #27 of 55 brands we track. That's roughly mid-pack. Fabric data can't speak to labor practices, emissions, or water use, so treat this as one input, not a verdict.

Is Pull&Bear fast fashion?

We measure fabric, not business models — so we can't classify Pull&Bear as fast fashion or not. What the data shows: 22.9% of their products are polyester-heavy and 43.3% are nearly all-natural (95%+ natural fibre). Heavy synthetic reliance often correlates with fast-fashion production, but it isn't proof either way.

Is Pull&Bear good quality?

Fabric composition is a reasonable quality proxy: natural fibres generally breathe better, last longer, and shed fewer microplastics. Pull&Bear averages 59.4% natural fibre, which is about average. Individual items vary widely, so check the composition label on each piece.

Is Pull&Bear worth it? Should I buy from them?

That depends on what you're buying. 43.3% of Pull&Bear's catalog is nearly all-natural, so good pieces exist even beyond their solid average. Use the Fibr extension to check fabric composition on individual items while you shop — it varies more within a brand than between brands.

Is Pull&Bear mostly synthetic or natural?

39.1% of Pull&Bear products are majority synthetic (less than 50% natural fibre by weighted content). The catalog as a whole averages 59.4% natural fibre, so it leans mixed.

Related reports.

Explore the Thread Report

Part of an openly-licensed dataset.

This page is one view of Fibr's Thread Report — fabric composition data for major fashion retailers, free to read and cite. Explore the rest:

Stop buying plastic by accident.

Fibr shows you what every garment is actually made of before you buy it. Green means natural fibre. Red means plastic.

Add to Chrome — It's free

Free forever. No account, no data collected, nothing to lose.