Thread Report
Abercrombie & Fitch vs Pull&Bear: Fabric Quality.
We compared 50 Abercrombie & Fitch products against 730 Pull&Bear products. Abercrombie & Fitch comes out significantly ahead at 73.7% average natural fibre vs Pull&Bear's 57.2%. The biggest gap is in sweaters, where Abercrombie & Fitch averages 46.8% natural fibre vs Pull&Bear's 24.7%.
Head-to-Head
Average Natural Fibre %
Polyester-Heavy Products %
Nearly All-Natural Products %
By Category
| Category | Abercrombie & Fitch (count) | Pull&Bear (count) | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sweater | 46.8% (5) | 24.7% (10) | +22.1 |
Monthly Thread Reports
Get reports like this in your inbox.
We analyze thousands of products every month. Be the first to see new Thread Reports — fabric data nobody else publishes.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Abercrombie & Fitch or Pull&Bear better quality?
In terms of fabric composition, Abercrombie & Fitch averages 73.7% natural fibre compared to Pull&Bear's 57.2%. Higher natural fibre content generally means better quality, breathability, and fewer microplastics.
Abercrombie & Fitch vs Pull&Bear: which uses more polyester?
Pull&Bear uses more polyester — 23% of their products are polyester-heavy, vs 6% at Abercrombie & Fitch.
Should I shop at Abercrombie & Fitch or Pull&Bear?
If fabric quality matters to you, Abercrombie & Fitch has the edge with 73.7% average natural fibre. But quality varies by product — use the Fibr extension to check individual items while you shop at either retailer.
Related reports.
Stop buying plastic by accident.
Fibr shows you what every garment is actually made of before you buy it. Green means natural fibre. Red means plastic.
Add to Chrome — It's freeFree forever. No account, no data collected, nothing to lose.