H&M is the world's second-largest fashion retailer. They sell billions of garments per year across 75+ markets. They've also positioned themselves as leaders in sustainable fashion — with organic cotton commitments, recycled polyester targets, and a green-tagged "Conscious Collection."
But what are H&M clothes actually made of? We looked at the data.
Overview
H&M's numbers look better than much of fast fashion. Cotton is their primary material, and their polyester rate is lower than Zara's. But the headline figure — 22% polyester in the total mix — masks the reality that most individual garments still contain some synthetic content.
How H&M Compares
H&M sits in the middle. Better than Zara and dramatically better than Shein, but nowhere near brands like Reformation (2.56% synthetic) or Gap (~5-10%).
What H&M Is Actually Made Of
Based on H&M's sustainability reports and our product analysis, the material breakdown looks like this:
- Cotton — H&M's single largest material. They're one of the world's largest users of organic cotton, though organic cotton still represents a fraction of total cotton used. Cotton dominates their basics: t-shirts, jeans, underwear, and simple knitwear.
- Polyester — Present in approximately 65% of garments, though not always as the primary material. Dominates dresses, activewear, and outerwear. 94% is now recycled polyester (rPET), sourced from post-consumer plastic bottles.
- Viscose — Common in dresses, blouses, and summer pieces. Semi-synthetic — made from wood pulp but through chemical processing.
- Elastane — Blended into jeans, underwear, and anything with stretch. Usually 2-5% but makes garments harder to recycle.
- Acrylic — Found in cheaper knitwear and sweaters. A fully synthetic alternative to wool.
The Conscious Collection Problem
H&M's Conscious Collection (now labelled "Conscious Choice") carries a green hang tag and implies sustainable materials. Here's what it actually means:
- A garment needs at least 50% "more sustainable" material to qualify
- "Recycled polyester" counts as a sustainable material — even though it still sheds microplastics, traps heat, doesn't breathe, and takes centuries to decompose
- Many Conscious items are still majority synthetic — a dress that's 55% recycled polyester and 45% conventional polyester qualifies for the green tag
- The label tells you the source is better (recycled vs virgin petroleum), not that the material is natural or safe for your skin
This is the core tension: recycled polyester is genuinely better than virgin polyester from an environmental source perspective. But it's still plastic clothing with all the same problems for your body — heat trapping, bacterial growth, microplastic shedding, and chemical treatments.
Category Breakdown
Like all fast fashion brands, H&M's fabric composition varies enormously by category:
The Good
- Basic t-shirts — often 100% cotton, especially in the core range. H&M's cotton basics are genuinely competitive.
- Denim — primarily cotton-based (80-98% cotton with elastane for stretch). H&M jeans are among the most natural items in their catalogue.
- Underwear — cotton options widely available, though synthetic options exist too. Check the label.
The Bad
- Dresses — overwhelmingly polyester. Even "linen blend" dresses often contain majority polyester. This is H&M's biggest synthetic category by volume.
- Outerwear — coats and jackets are heavily synthetic. Even wool-look coats are frequently polyester or acrylic-dominant.
- Activewear — 100% synthetic across the board. Polyester and elastane, no natural fibre options.
- Sweaters — often acrylic (cheap wool substitute) rather than actual wool or cotton. Check the label carefully.
The Premium Brand Gap
H&M Group owns several brands at different price tiers, and fabric quality correlates directly with price:
- H&M (core) — ~22% polyester mix. Cotton-heavy basics, synthetic everything else.
- COS — significantly higher natural fibre content. More linen, wool, and quality cotton. Fewer synthetics.
- Arket — consistently uses higher-quality natural materials and heavier fabric weights.
- & Other Stories — mid-tier, better than core H&M but still mixed.
If you like H&M's aesthetic but want better fabrics, COS and Arket are worth the premium. The difference in fabric quality is real, not just marketing.
The Verdict
H&M is better than most fast fashion for natural fibres — cotton is their primary material, and their polyester rate (~22%) is lower than Zara's (~27%) and far lower than Shein's (64-82%). Their basics (t-shirts, jeans, underwear) are genuinely good picks for natural fabric.
But 65%+ of garments still contain synthetics, the Conscious Collection label is misleading (recycled polyester is still plastic), and categories like dresses, outerwear, and knitwear are heavily synthetic. Like all fast fashion, you have to check each item individually.
Methodology
This audit draws on H&M Group's published sustainability reports, the Changing Markets Foundation's "Synthetics Anonymous" industry analysis, and Fibr's own product-level composition analysis. Material mix percentages are based on H&M's reported tonnage data. Individual garment analysis was conducted by examining product composition labels across multiple H&M categories. The 65%+ synthetic garment figure reflects the proportion of individual products containing any synthetic fibre, not the overall material weight.